No-one ever ‘caught’ an illness from an exercise bike or mat, yet I’m frowned upon for not disappearing in a mist of pink spray after class.
And yet another trillion dollar win for the Pharma/chemical industry.
The spec sheet for these anti-microbial (anti-tiny life) and anti-viral sprays claim that they have low toxicity based on available data. Meaning they haven’t done any safety studies.
They do they contain biocidal (life killing) ingredients. They claim to ‘kill’ coronavirus; which are not living beings. Myself and the microbiome that protects my skin, nose, airways, lungs, guts, brain are. If sprays destroy ‘viral’ protein coat or RNA they are also toxic to every cell and process in my body.
The health of the microbiome in pesticide free soil, our food and within our bodies and guts is ESSENTIAL to our health, to prevent cancers, Alzheimers and Parkinsons, asthma, eczema, Crohn’s and UC.
The whole of the toxicity data can be summed up as follows; ‘There are no data on the ecotoxicity of this product. Not regarded as dangerous for the environment.’
Have we heard that anywhere before.
What is known as the the Cutter incident occurred in 1955. Vaccines are made by adding samples from sick people to cell cultures of abnormal monkey cells. The cultures are passaged many times: some cells are taken away so more grow. Heavy metal preservatives that are known neurotoxins are added to these cell cultures which are renamed ‘vaccines’. Many people in the Cutter incident were killed and became ill by the toxicity of the vaccines themselves- they contained neurotoxins, RNA and proteins from people whose bodies were trying to detoxify.
Some of the contacts of vaccinees of the Salk vaccine (which had a record breaking 2 hour approval process!) became paralysed and some died. This was due to a supposed 'live' version of the polio virus being used in the vaccine.
Some children who had been vaccinated didn't get sick, but their mothers became very ill and so did their neighbours.
Undoubtedly the mothers were the ones desperately spraying their homes with. DDT, and spending the most time in their homes, when they heard that a ‘live’ virus was on the loose, which explains why the mothers were the ones who became the most ill.
The growing number of cancers in the past few years can be linked with the jabs, but also with crazy use of microbial sprays killing cells and destroying our microbiome, our best protection from cancer.
We seem destined to never learn from the past.
Jo
PS. I have left the gym in the interests of my health.
Jo
I took the Salk vaccine in the early 1960s. They lined the children all up and we were given a sugar cube. I never heard of any reactions at the time, but I was probably 7 years old. I also remember WWII bombers, maybe B24s, dumping DDT laced chunks of corn trying to push back the invading fire ants that were offloaded in Mobile from S. America. I also remember riding bikes with my brothers and neighbor children behind the mosquito fogger trucks right up in the fog. The fog was an oil based DDT. Almost all of us have lived into our 60s with no noticeable reactions from the DDT. Analysis from sediments in Yazoo river sediments downstream in the 1990s from the Mississippi delta farming areas showed that the remaining DDT was bound to the sediments and was not bio-available.
Base on personal experience, DDT is not the boogie man that it had been made out to be.
"based on available data"... You read that right, it hasn't been studied! Another one that emerged the last two years is "there's no evidence for ..." That used to mean it has been studied and there's no evidence for it, but now means it hasn't been studied.