Outcomes of 'There's absolutely no evidence for it, but a viral cause is our best guess' vs
Sneezing and pustules are evidence of detoxification
Yawns and smiles appear to pass between people in close proximity. There’s no suggestion of a virus. There is, though, a survival advantage to whatever the reason for yawning is and smiling assists in the bonding of the group. There must be unconscious triggers, visual or some other sensory form, not actual entities that cause yawns and smiles to spread.
Some collections of symptoms initially thought to be caused by infectious agents have been shown to due to nutritional deficiencies or eradicated by improvements in sanitation.
Pustules are clearly the body expelling metabolites and toxins from the body. Symptoms of fever, inflammation, sneezing and coughing are clearly the body forcing out toxins through the throat, mouth, nose, eyes and skin using heat, mucus and sweat.
There is no evidence that disease is sexually transmitted.
There is no evidence that respiratory symptoms are passed between people by infectious viruses; neither through observing the way symptoms and deaths occur and spread through a population, nor by trying to transmit disease between hosts in experiments, nor by finding the actual entities in samples.
There is a survival advantage to people in close proximity, who are usually part of the same family or work group, to produce symptoms of detoxification at the same time as they will all be exposed to the same toxins and products of work, family and money stresses, though they may be unconscious of them. The initial person may detect the need to detox and produces symptoms. The symptoms trigger symptoms in others, and as there is no evidence that these triggers are infectious agents, we must assume that they are something else; visual, aural, olfactory, pheromones or micro RNA. People may also become ‘ill’ at the beginning of a holiday as the body takes this a signal to detox and rest.
What has been the outcome of the ‘best guess’ of thinking that viruses pass between people who live or work together and cause respiratory symptoms? $trillions spent (and made) on fruitlessly searching for them, billions of drugs, antivirals and vaccines manufactured, blaming each other for our poor health, lockdowns and ineffective mask wearing enforced.
By all assessments these measures have made our lives, our economies and our health much, much worse.
What is the outcome for thinking that these respiratory symptoms of ‘colds’ and ‘flu’ must have a purpose for the body and leaving them untreated?
Apart from the elderly, frail or malnourished and those who force themselves to work instead of resting; everyone gets better.
What would be the outcome of thinking that detox symptoms need no intervention other than to listen to our own bodies? What would be the outcome of accepting that the drugs only work to make us sicker?
No need for research, vaccines or drugs. No money or jobs in Pharma or regulation. No glory for politicians. Medical education and doctors only needed for A&E. No need to watch the news for information on pandemics or for the latest medical breakthroughs. No need for opinions or talking heads. No need for the WHO or the World Council for Health. No need for experts, even ones telling us to do our own research or to get in touch with our bodies. No fear for globalists to scare and control us with.
Total personal autonomy, sovereignty and responsibility.
Jo
Indeed. It can be our reality though.
Jo
One thing both sides have in common is the need to “isolate” (I.e. sit at home for up to a week and do sweet FA) when you are experiencing symptoms. The germ lovers because it stops you from passing it on, the terrainers because it best allows your body to fully detoxify. Maybe that’s a common ground that can be focused on going forward.