Great to see Michael Yeadon's name there. I saw the interview between Cowan and Mark Bailey about this and heard that bit at the end. I was going to do a post about it but have been sidetracked by crazy.
"“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” ― Upton Sinclair
Imagine that everything you thought you knew and on which you staked your whole career and reputation was suddenly called into question, and your entire profession was held up as a sham. That's the spot these virologists find themselves in. It would take a brave soul indeed to even open his/her mind to the possibility.
Are there nano sized particles of "nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) enclosed in a protein coat"? Sure. Are they probably exosomes? Yes. Are they part of a global bio-communications system? I think so. Can they make you ill? Depends if you obey the information on the tape.
I just LOVE seeing Tim Noakes’s name on the list of signatories.
The man is a brilliant scientist and absolutely legendary student of human performance. His Lore of Running is an all-time classic, and his studies of hydration for performance and recovery shattered existing practice and likely saved a few lives.
For a recent response by Mike Yeardon, see this comment on Steve Kirsch's post on this matter. It starts with, "Steve, I no longer believe that what we call covid19 is caused by a novel respiratory virus.
I don’t believe it’s a fruitful line of argument though."
Steve is pretty firm in his position that there is a virus. It will be interesting to see if this new initiative goes anywhere.
Mike Yeardon's position is that the virus doesn't matter very much and he writes "I have evidence that the perpetrators have been rehearsing global pandemics & authoritarianism for 25 years. The entire event is a PsyOps enabled by deliberately terrible PCR testing.
The objective is totalitarian control via mandatory digital ID. This fits The Great Reset."
I certainly agree that the PCR is driving this. I agree that the quackcines should remain a target, but I think the virus question is still very much a question that needs to be asked. There are a number of issues involved and while it would be great progress to have this settled, there is too much at stake for certain parties to allow it to be without great resistance on a number of fronts.
Wonderful! I hope this gets done. I like the tone, coming together to prove it.
Great to see Michael Yeadon's name there. I saw the interview between Cowan and Mark Bailey about this and heard that bit at the end. I was going to do a post about it but have been sidetracked by crazy.
So all they need to do is send this to Steve Kirsch. He should sort out the rest from the side that are germ theorites
"“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” ― Upton Sinclair
Imagine that everything you thought you knew and on which you staked your whole career and reputation was suddenly called into question, and your entire profession was held up as a sham. That's the spot these virologists find themselves in. It would take a brave soul indeed to even open his/her mind to the possibility.
Are there nano sized particles of "nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) enclosed in a protein coat"? Sure. Are they probably exosomes? Yes. Are they part of a global bio-communications system? I think so. Can they make you ill? Depends if you obey the information on the tape.
Hello Mikey Mike, welcome to the party! Thanks for posting Jo
I just LOVE seeing Tim Noakes’s name on the list of signatories.
The man is a brilliant scientist and absolutely legendary student of human performance. His Lore of Running is an all-time classic, and his studies of hydration for performance and recovery shattered existing practice and likely saved a few lives.
I'm working on the issue at https://ilki.substack.com/p/vax-questions-for-experts/comments and https://ilki.substack.com/p/is-microbiology-real
good work!
For a recent response by Mike Yeardon, see this comment on Steve Kirsch's post on this matter. It starts with, "Steve, I no longer believe that what we call covid19 is caused by a novel respiratory virus.
I don’t believe it’s a fruitful line of argument though."
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/settling-the-virus-debate-challenge/comment/7805902
Steve is pretty firm in his position that there is a virus. It will be interesting to see if this new initiative goes anywhere.
Mike Yeardon's position is that the virus doesn't matter very much and he writes "I have evidence that the perpetrators have been rehearsing global pandemics & authoritarianism for 25 years. The entire event is a PsyOps enabled by deliberately terrible PCR testing.
The objective is totalitarian control via mandatory digital ID. This fits The Great Reset."
I certainly agree that the PCR is driving this. I agree that the quackcines should remain a target, but I think the virus question is still very much a question that needs to be asked. There are a number of issues involved and while it would be great progress to have this settled, there is too much at stake for certain parties to allow it to be without great resistance on a number of fronts.