Should we now smoke because the elites don't want us to?
And plans to 'cull' animals that were going to be milked to exhaustion or killed anyway
‘I eat meat and eggs because the elites don’t want me to.’ Nick Pye on Twitter.
Unlike many I’m sick of hearing about Klaus Schwab Square Pants and his Tufty Club, who get together to make fantasy videos about how one day they’ll be controlling the world (well the US,UK, Oz and NZ anyway, I doubt many in India (Modi has his own Davos style meetings), Pakistan, Europe, Russia, the ‘Middle East’, Africa, South America or China have even heard of them, nor will ever take any notice of them) to make up for the humiliation they suffered when they were little. I’m going to put the lost boys to bed.
Yes, the WHO is making a power grab for control of governments and milking germ hypothesis for all its worth. They will insist on lockdowns until governments buy vaccines and coerce their citizens to take them. But this is motivated by good old fashioned money, pharma and share holder greed. It was reported how happy KS was with carbon emissions during the pandemic, like the lockdowns were all down to him and not about the biggest transfer of wealth in history.
If the elites say they don’t want us doing smoking anymore should we assume that they’re just killjoys spoiling our fun and that smoking is now actually good for us? Should we smoke more to spite them? If they said be kind, shall we be unkind?
Studies by possibly very well meaning scientists for the WHO and the Lancet says sensible things about eating directly from the soil being more friendly to the environment and fairer for all, as well as about treating other animals better, which of course they obviously should be, are all discredited because the elites must be controlling us with them. Should we then be actively pro animal abuse? Apparently so.
Tufty Club member Billy Bunter has hijacked all sensible discussion at the UN. He’s also invested in lab based flesh substitute products. If compassion for animals is now highlighted should we campaign against it? Yes, I have effectively been told it’s better not to have compassion, to be heartless so I could eat dead flesh and really shown them and everyone else that I wasn’t doing what they wanted me to do.
Doing and believing the opposite of what the Tufty Club are apparently saying, whatever the cost to ourselves or to anyone else, even if it aligns with common sense, inner wisdom, compassion and what’s blatantly the fairest thing for all, out of fear we’ll otherwise be victims of propaganda and control, to be bloody minded, ridiculously childish or to prove we can think for ourselves (although it proves the exact opposite), is seriously fucked up.
The Indian farmers were protesting against ownership of their livelihoods by big agrochemicals. Yields in India are 30-40% lowers than global average thanks to the Green Revolution and Indian farmers are resistant to large scale intensive farming and Gates Ag One.
The Dutch farmers were protesting for the right to earn a living by importing non-species specific, non-organic, GMO fodder. They were fighting on behalf of the petrochemical industry, politically if not financially supported by them and for the right to farm intensively bred, methane producing, multi-vaccinated, and medicalised animals kept mostly indoors.
Bunter also says he supports a smaller global population, so should we support an expanding population? Apparently so; fear of the imminent collapse in human society caused by women being better educated and male fertility declining (though over 1.4 billion and counting people in India seem to be doing OK) is hyped up, and some also good old fashioned misogyny is thrown in for good measure. If Western society is indeed declining we could adjust to being better fed, better educated, more equal, less materialist and less destructive. Instead we think it better to tell women not to have careers but to have more children ad infinitum, who can then pay our pensions and wipe our bums. If we weren’t so hyper medicalised, eating so many sick animals and so little fresh fruit, veg and legumes we’d live healthy, productive lives until near the day we died.
What sticks in the craw is knowing that whatever they say, the elites will still be driving about, flying in private jets, jetting into space, reproducing and eating whatever they please. That’s why it’s important to make sure laws and measures are applied equally. To ban lobbying. To address cronyism. To make sure the richest pay taxes. To make sure that justice is blind. The richest 10% account for 50% of the GHG emissions (that’s you and me in the West) and the top 1% of the wealthiest account for 25%.
We must resist the take over and buying of farm land by the agrochemical/GMO industry and stop Bunter stealing land, heritage seeds and information on farming; which he’ll then try to sell back to us. And we must also protect our own health, that of the soil, pollinators, our microbiome as well as the planet and non-humans by stopping genetic engineering, geo-engineering, vivisection, pesticides, fertilisers, vaccines and animal agriculture (and not smoke).
We must reject Bunter, his Ag One, his (not as healthy as whole plant food) burgers, and his take over bid of the West’s food system but we must also become compassionate, regenerative, mindful of developing countries, organic plant based people. They are not mutually exclusive. They are both essential.
Announcing ‘plans’ to kill animals who exist to be killed is deliberately creating support for the animal agriculture industry. It works well.
And anyway, we also colluded to imprison, control the feed of, breed and genetically engineer our fellow earthlings so that we could eat them and steal their milk and eggs.
No one has any right to treat anyone the way we treat other animals.
I hope this will be a big turning point in awakening.
🐒
Jo
I do not need "studies" to tell me exercise is good for me or smoking bad. I understand the tenor of this piece, of course, and appreciate the sarcasm, but after spending the last three years trying to convince people of the most obvious flipping thing -- that something can only be said to "exist" if it's proven to exist --, I'm wondering what happened to the basic intuitive faculty of people that they require "studies" (and the prognostications of "experts") to predict the future (?) and tell them what's "real" or not. Not that people actually review all these false papers (they'll note the title or, at most, review the abstract), but they do certainly treat them as authoritative, thus regularly committing the logical fallacy of appealing to authority. If you have to resort to an "expert" or "study" to determine whether you can breathe freely when you go outside, then there's something seriously wrong with you. You are indeed "sick."
I thoroughly enjoyed the snarky flavor of this article today, it actually made things feel much better overall. Thank you for pointing out that there are a few quite important things that could be done to level the playing field rather than spend all our energy focusing on/fighting about the details of this & that. I'm ready to seize the day now!!