14 Comments
May 16, 2023·edited Aug 25, 2023Liked by Jo Waller

I do not need "studies" to tell me exercise is good for me or smoking bad. I understand the tenor of this piece, of course, and appreciate the sarcasm, but after spending the last three years trying to convince people of the most obvious flipping thing -- that something can only be said to "exist" if it's proven to exist --, I'm wondering what happened to the basic intuitive faculty of people that they require "studies" (and the prognostications of "experts") to predict the future (?) and tell them what's "real" or not. Not that people actually review all these false papers (they'll note the title or, at most, review the abstract), but they do certainly treat them as authoritative, thus regularly committing the logical fallacy of appealing to authority. If you have to resort to an "expert" or "study" to determine whether you can breathe freely when you go outside, then there's something seriously wrong with you. You are indeed "sick."

Expand full comment

I thoroughly enjoyed the snarky flavor of this article today, it actually made things feel much better overall. Thank you for pointing out that there are a few quite important things that could be done to level the playing field rather than spend all our energy focusing on/fighting about the details of this & that. I'm ready to seize the day now!!

Expand full comment

My first encounter with this constant citation of 'studies' was when I began using social media in 2012.

It is amazing that I survived the previous six decades, held down various careers, raised a happy family, formed opinions and generally had a good time.

I also smoked.

One other minor point - lung cancer has increased since people were coerced to give up smoking. Now people are using nicotine patches to protect against whatever is the latest lurgy on the tell-lie-vision.

#clownworld

Expand full comment
Removed (Banned)May 16, 2023Liked by Jo Waller
Comment removed
Expand full comment