10 Comments
Aug 3, 2022·edited Aug 3, 2022Liked by Jo Waller

Omg, I didn't even think an "in silico study" was a thing. People won't even know it was done on a computer. Pathetic.

By the way, I haven't been reading all the SK comments, but are you taking Steve Kirsch up on his challenge? Have you commented on this article?

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-then-how-can

Expand full comment
Aug 4, 2022Liked by Jo Waller

thanks, good stuff. Appreciate the link to Christine Massey's work.

puzzling out a few things lately

Broxmeyer's 2011 Nexus article lays the foundation.

https://www.academia.edu/12968949/INFLUENZA_AND_THE_TUBERCULOSIS_CONNECTION_Part_1

Grant Genereux's hypothesis that they put Retinoic Acid in the inoculations is supported on a number of fronts; gleaned from his voracious scrubbing of papers for almost ten years now. If you want the full download over here let me know. Steve Kirsch ignored it back in November when he was all about sending vials to an independent lab.

Ran across this paper today, on a combo-search at PubMed - "Retinoic Acid and Tuberculosis".

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34033876/

Retinoic acid induces antimicrobial peptides and cytokines leading to Mycobacterium tuberculosis elimination in airway epithelial cells

adds a bit of fuel to the fire

Expand full comment