Demolition of the HIV/AIDS theory
The importance of using controls
In the early 80’s a group of men, who had not had physical contact with each other, presented with similar, though not new, symptoms; Kaposi Sarcoma (KS), lymphadenopathy and asthenia (tiredness). Their use of (since banned) toxic and carcinogenic nitrite inhalants, their heavy drug use, lack of sleep, excessive prophylactic use of mitochondria damaging antibiotics and anti-fungals and their poor diets were all ignored. This collection of symptoms was gathered into a single syndrome and called AIDS, and the cause was assumed to be a virus.
Luc Montagnier took a sample from one of these patients (BRU) and in 1983 claimed that he had purified it and seen HIV. He did not show any confirmatory EM pictures; which he said were unnecessary. In 1997 he admitted that they hadn’t purified the sample nor seen HIV after all; the EM images showed only cellular debris.
The BRU lymph node sample was added to umbilical cord lymphocytes, antibiotics and the highly oxidising mitogen (a substance that increases cell division) PHA were added and the culture was left on the bench for a few weeks.
The ‘isolation’ of HIV was then claimed to have been observed by:-
a) the detection of reverse transcriptase activity which was thought to indicate the presence of a retrovirus,
b) budding of viral like particles from cells in the culture
c) detections of antibodies to a protein, p24, in BRU’s serum after adding radioactively labelled methionine (which incorporates into proteins and allows them to be later visualised on a photographic plate), to the cell culture. This protein was then claimed to be the ‘HIV” protein.
d) presence of novel RNA sequences claimed to be parts of ‘HIV’ ‘genomes’
No controls were done, which would have shown that:-
a) reverse transcriptase activity is present in all human cells when stimulated with PHA
b) budding of viral like particles occurs in ‘uninfected’ control cell cultures, as below, due to the culture conditions themselves
c) The p24 had not been shown to come from a virus. There are many studies which show that antibodies to the p24 protein are prevalent worldwide amongst individuals who do not have AIDS nor are at risk of AIDS. Montagnier also did not find antibodies to reverse transcriptase p66, said to be essential to a retrovirus.
Gel electrophoresis shows that p24 is present, in smaller amounts, in healthy people. If p24 is not unique to AIDS patients it cannot be a protein that indicates the presence of the supposed cause of AIDS ie ‘HIV’.
d) The novel RNA sequences are in fact sequences of adenine rich RNA which are produced by all dividing cells.
Montagnier showed no evidence of a virus at all; either by EM, presence of reverse transcriptase, observation of cell budding, novel RNA sequences nor by unique proteins nor unique antibodies.
‘HIV’ causing ‘AIDS’ was not shown by epidemiology either. A positive ‘HIV’ test (indicative of an imbalance in the body not a virus) was only correlated with the frequency of receptive anal sex, in either gender, and not with homosexual or heterosexual intercourse in general. Semen is very oxidising and the anus is very thin. CDC scientists accepted that HIV couldn’t cause the supposed AIDS symptom KS either and its incidence has dramatically decreased since the highly toxic formulas of poppers were banned in 1988 and in 1990.
Montagnier himself admitted that he thought good nutrition would both prevent and cure AIDS
Yet despite all this, HIV being the probable causes of AIDS was announced at a press conference in 1984, which dissenting scientists were not allowed to attend and use of anti-virals such as AZT were recommended as the only treatment on receiving a positive’ test.
The PCR could not be used to test for ‘HIV’ because there are so many different uploaded, hypothetical variations of computer generated ‘genome’ constructed by various groups from the RNA sequences found in patients with symptoms. Millions of these different sequences are found in healthy people and trillions in sick people. Different ‘variants’ occurring in the same person. There were 10 million ‘genomes’ of HIV uploaded onto GenBank as of 1999 and a variance between them of up to 40%. It defies belief that all these ‘genomes’ (made up sequences) can actually be coding for the same entity. Full genome or Sanger sequencing does not help; it uses nested PCR primers for short sequences; it does not sequence end to end as claimed.
The diagnosis of HIV is therefore made on the presence of the protein p24 or antibodies to it. Is supposedly indicative of ‘HIV’ but is also found in people with many cancers, inflammatory conditions or pregnancy.The diagnosis of HIV is therefore partly based on the ‘test’; detection of an arbitrary amount of antibodies which bind to the ‘HIV’ protein (detection of antibodies merely means that the body has encountered this protein before, it does not mean that they are ‘HIV’ antibodies; p24 was never shown to be unique to a ‘virus’) but mostly made on patient history. Frequent blood transfusions (though a ‘virus’ by their definition would not survive the process), and being a Black African or a gay man are more likely to get you a positive result.
Only seeing a ‘positive’ result where one expects to see one. This is so far removed from the scientific method as to defy belief.
Antivirals such as AZT are very oxidising, and cause more abnormalities and changes in RNA sequences. This explains why ‘viral load’ seems to decrease, or become non-detectable in patients treated with AZT as the PCR primers no longer detect the alleged ‘genome’ sequences that they are looking for.
AZT was made to appear to reduce the death rate from AIDS; after its introduction healthy people with a positive HIV test were included as AIDS cases. These people would die of other causes and AZT would appear to have improved the death rate in the HIV population, even if it killed everyone treated with it. It did, in fact, kill nearly everyone treated with it.
Many people have taken their own lives after a ‘positive’ test and many more were killed by the toxic effects of AZT. A trillion dollar research and pharmaceutical industry based on an entirely false premise. Nancy Turner Banks in her book ‘AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire’ argues convincingly that the HIV/AIDS story was deliberately written to mask the effects of allowing drugs, particularly crack cocaine, into deprived Black and Hispanic areas of the US, as well as illnesses suffered by black people in Africa who were economically forced to work in dangerously and cheaply run, dust-filled diamond mines.
The real causes of so called ‘AIDS’ and disease; poverty, poor sanitation, malnutrition, drug use and lack of sleep are not addressed. $trillions has been given by the tax payer, NGOs and charities to Big Pharma to make drugs that harm and kill us.
P.s The brilliant documentaries House of Numbers
and the work of the Perth Group on Montagnier’s experiments explained in full in the Emperors New Virus are well worth a look.
Thanks for reading Georgie&Donnys Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Dourmashkin RR, Bucher D, Oxford JS. Small virus-like particles bud from the cell membranes of normal as well as HIV-infected human lymphoid cells. J Med Virol 1993. 39:229-232.)
Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. The Journal of cell biology 2013. 200:373-383
Nobel lecture 1983
Pinter A, Honnen WJ, Tilley SA, Bona C, Zaghouani H, Gorny MK, Zolla-Pazner S. Oligomeric structure of gp41, the transmembrane protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 1989. 63:2674-2679.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2880160/ Risk factors for seroconversion to human immunodeficiency virus among male homosexuals. Results from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study